In the back of that book Gillett has a 390 track playlist that only someone as crazy as my friend Cliff would set out to actually assemble in it's entirety. Well he did and it plays like one of the better musicology classes one could take. The sequencing essentially give the audio illustration of the book.
If you should notice that the list is larger than the one in your edition of the book, it is because this one incorporates all the material from all the editions. Once again, THIS IS 390 TRACKS! To do this, even in 160 mp3 requires well over a gig so it is a 7 part group of zippyshare links that are connected.
"These are the records which moved rock ’n’
roll another inch or two forward. The reasons for including each record vary,
but each of them became a part of the background for anyone making records
thereafter. Some are here because they brought a new musical idea into the
framework of “rock’n’ roll” – piano boogie, guitar boogie, bass boogie; others
redefined the use of an instrument – electric guitar, back-beat drums, electric
bass, electric piano. And each new way of using a voice is represented by the
person who thought of it first, usually with their first hit. The list is
biased against the real giants of the era – Elvis Presley, the Beatles, Bob
Dylan – whose every record tended to be a trigger for a host of imitators; for
them, and for the Motown artists, a few representative records are listed,
trying to catch most facets of what they did. It is easier to represent
contributions by the majority of performers who only had one basic idea. Most
of the records in the list were best-sellers, and they are listed in the
chronological order in which they first surfaced on a national chart in the USA
(pop, rhythm & blues, or country and western) or Britain. In addition to
the artist, title, and record label, the recording location and producer are listed,
to give an idea of the geographical shifts during the period, which saw records
made in most regions of the United States and then, increasingly important
through the sixties, in Britain. A few records are listed which were not hits,
mostly to represent the first recording of a song which became part of the rock
’n’ roll repertoire, but occasionally to acknowledge a record whose value was
recognized too late to affect its chance of making the charts. The term
“producer” did not come into common use in the music industry until around
1957, so for prior recordings the terms “arranger” and “supervisor” have been
used. The letters “p”,“a” and “s” are used in the following pages. Ideally, the
name of the recording studio and the recording engineer would be provided too,
but as such information is still largely undocumented, I have not attempted to
find it. The labels listed sometimes include the original label in parentheses
before the name of the label which licensed the record for national
distribution; and sometimes add in parentheses the name of a parent company
where the record was a hit on a subsidiary label."
Gillett, Charlie (2011-01-04). The Sound of
the City: The Rise of Rock & Roll (Kindle Locations 9725-9736). Souvenir
Press. Kindle Edition.

20 comments:
http://www39.zippyshare.com/v/21090054/file.html
http://www39.zippyshare.com/v/28958088/file.html
http://www39.zippyshare.com/v/2626354/file.html
http://www39.zippyshare.com/v/90810937/file.html
http://www39.zippyshare.com/v/18446885/file.html
http://www16.zippyshare.com/v/49246926/file.html
http://www39.zippyshare.com/v/95248642/file.html
This is a work of great dedication and impressive commitment from our friend Cliff.
Wonderful for us to be able to share in its benefits.
Good to have this posted at Chitlins and the Cult to get as many as possible enjoying this great post - Cheers again Cliff
wow. and wow some more. and then a wow. many, many thank yous on this labor of love and generosity. i'll have more--and something substantive--to say later, but now . . . wow
and for those who, like me, are not luddites but still prefer actual books to "books" (sorry, i'm in publishing . . .), here is another cite: Da Capo Press; 2 edition (March 22, 1996), as it made its way back to print and is still available.
KC & Cliff... thank you very much... good to see how all the threads of culture come together in music. Cliff, thanks for your great generosity. Gouldee
Some years ago I ran across a comment which averred that a good book about music made you want to listen. Gillett managed this trick for me back in the late 70s when Sound Of The City first came out. Back then my first stab consisted of a large number of cassette tapes and a lot of leg work. Finding James Wayne(s) back then was a near insurmountable chore. In 2000 I took another shot, my initial use of the computer as storage for music. I should point out that there is going to be some variation in quality which is entirely on me. KC has made a yeoman's effort to clean and balance the sound. Something simple next time, probably Dawson & Propes' What Was The First Rock 'n' Roll Record. Only 50 tracks.
I was gonna post this behind the moldy green door but seems I'm unwelcome. --- Jazzjet - There is surprisingly little overlap between the CG Sound Of The City CDs and the list(s) in the books. The only set which I found especially fine was the NOLA set. The World Music sets were excellent as was Honky Tonk. In the long run I wouldn't pass up any of them though they all sell for crazy $$$ these days. Cliff
The Gillett New Orleans set is in the pipeline to appear soon
I read Gillett's book subsequent to Le Roi's recommendation for a book from which I could gain a better knowledge of the music and its impact that transcended my unlettered gut reaction to what I like. Not having have heard about one half of Gillett's list at the book's end, I figured I'd come across the songs by and by through blogs. Of course, that hasn't been the case and this post and the amount of work required to assemble and present the collection leaves me awestruck and bowled over with gratitude. I've nuclear medicine testing tomorrow and John Kerry's pleas and United Nations' sanctions notwithstanding, I'm going through with it if only to be more radiant afterwards and, too, radiate better comments here and elsewhere as well as finally respond to so many unanswered E-mails, including some from that winsome and incredibly generous English bloke who has named himself after his instrument of choice (having no musical skills, I'd name myself after my instrument but Johnson is such a common surname, and there's the total lack of decorum and my wife's embarrassment at my making much ado about nothing, to quote the Bardl) of the past few weeks. So I had not checked the blog this week until tonight and planned to comment when I felt a wee bit better and could write more cogently after the tests are concluded and the iodine has left my system. However, this post demanded a response because it is an incredible testament to your and Unky Cliff's love of the music and the huge amount of time you have devoted to educating about and sharing it. More importantly, it is a phenomenal gift. It is an example of what makes this blog so vital and important to those of us, musicians, lovers of good music, and untalented but obsessed musical junkies like myself. After listening to it all, I will have to re-read Gillett and that's a pleasure to which I look forward. Again, thank you both so much.
Cliff !!! Unwelcome at the green door ! ? No Way ! It must be a technical problem ? Surely ?
If you would like copies of CG's World Music compilations ( all excellent !) or the Honky Tonk comp ... I'll post at the Cult
Cheers bro !
Appreciate the offer Gus but I have all (?) the comps, in spite of name and label changes over the years.
n case anyone is a technological Luddite and an incurable musicholic, like me, who hasn't hooked decent speakers to his or her computer me and resorts to his or her trusted and decades-old compact disc player and four aged speakers to listen to the really good stuff, l decided to burn Unky Cliff's compilation of Gillett's list to give it the serious attention it warrants before re-reading Gillett and can report that it is truly a monster. The good news is that I recognize far more of the songs than I initially thougth; the bad news is that I have just completed burning disc 10 which ends with song 283. I hope to finish tonight and, given that I am retired and don't have to rise for work early in the morning, should be able to do so. To have the set for listening at home and in my car is fantastic. Again thanks, Unky Cliff, and, too, Le Roi, for cleaning and balancing the sound. Whether one agrees with the significance of all of Gillett's choices, the total package amounts to a history of the rhythm and blues, soul, and rock music that I have enjoyed throughout my life and is really an astounding piece of work by both of you. Not to mention that it brings back warm memories of the glorious days of A.M. radio when an eclectic mixture of music was played over the airwaves.
Wow!!! KC can I make a series in Mixcloud using this?? It will obviously have to be in a few parts. You would be welcome to embed each part here or link to the entire series.
Thanks for this amazing resource!
Simply monumental !!! Thank you tons
Thanks KC & Cliff - Appreciate your work on this. Reminds me why this music had such a profound effect on me.
Charlie was an honest man with a good heart filled with lots of love for music but some odd taste transgressions.
(Unlike my good self, of course: a paragon absolutely without blemish)
It's a long time since I read the book and I have been pondering Gus's question about what we think he may have overlooked and become embroiled with usual negativity about what he should never have included - despite being English. These are, he says, "records which moved rock ’n’ roll another inch or two forward", and became "part of the background for anyone making records thereafter". Yet the first track my iTunes kicks up on the list with its automatic alphabetical ordering by artist is Adam Faith's "What Do You Want" - a monumental triumph of insignificance. How can that be on the list?. I would sling out Barry McGuire, too. WTF? Now, I know this might possibly upset some others, but I also give short shrift to some of the Beatles' pop fluff. I am all for keeping "A Hard Day's Night" on the list. And "Day Tripper", "We Can Work It Out", "Eleanor Rigby", "Hey Jude" and might actually choose to add "All You Need Is Love" and "Paperback Writer" - but I can see no reason for tolerating the presence of their irrelevant pop-fluff-stuff like "Love Me Do", "She Loves You", and "I Want To Hold Your Hand".
And Biily Fury?
Really?
Moved rock'n'roll forward?
An inspiration to those who followed?
Sorry, Chaz - I just don't get it.
Maybe I'll feel better with "C".
Sorry, the links are dead.
Can you please repost the files, KC ?
Thank you very much!
not going to happen, the number of things you've asked for is so huge that I'd never get to do anything new - sometimes when you are too late, you're too late
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.